kdelibs and the GPL
Neil Stevens
neil at qualityassistant.com
Mon Jun 17 18:29:38 BST 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Monday June 17, 2002 10:05, Thomas Zander wrote:
> The reasoning as to _why_ this is a problem would be nice to hear. I'm
> sure it would be a nice thing for companies to code against the kdelibs
> under the LGPL licence instead of the GPL. But your email suggest KDE
> is violating some copyrights, am I missing something?
Well, as long as KDE is shipping binaries of noatun's split playlist, some
interpretations of the GPL will have KDE breaking the copyright. And it
won't be just noatun. kdelibs would be pretty useless if they are
infected with the GPL, as there are so many free software licenses that
the GPL refuses to work with.
- --
Neil Stevens - neil at qualityassistant.com
"I always cheer up immensely if an attack is particularly wounding
because I think, well, if they attack one personally, it means they
have not a single political argument left." - Margaret Thatcher
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9DhyCf7mnligQOmERAjJxAKCH0qCNYxqN2CJcmZEjb/8NDI0w1QCfZhdy
2jdDQhZtbV+ZlOTg+qEfPgM=
=UbOF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list