The "E" in "KDE" (more or less was: KDE RC Authority)

[David Faure]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Saturday 06 July 2002 22:00, Neil Stevens wrote:
> On Saturday July 06, 2002 04:49, aleXXX wrote:
> > Yes, I think these discussions should stop now, after hundreds of mails
> > in "Authority of the RC", "The E in KDE", "Fundamental library problem"
> > and "Make users count". All is said, some people keep repeating the same
> > arguments over and over again.
> 
> Oh, of course they will.  Those who want innovation in the core and
> completeness in the environment obviously have to go elsewhere.

So if I wanted to convert KDE to e.g. Java, I should simply create
as many threads as necessary, on kde-core-devel, trying to convince
everyone to switch to Java, even if this means creating 500 messages
threads, where everyone tells me it's not a good idea, and I should just
keep repeating "you don't want change, so I have to go elsewhere"?
Or should I maybe stop at some point and understand that if I'm the only
one (or almost the only one) who wants such a core change, then maybe
it shouldn't be done after all?
Majority means majority of people, not majority of the posts (by a single person or two).
(No I'm not talking about a vote here, but something that affects the core
should be ok with most, shouldn't it?)

- -- 
David FAURE, david at mandrakesoft.com, faure at kde.org
http://people.mandrakesoft.com/~david/
Contributing to: http://www.konqueror.org/, http://www.koffice.org/
KOffice-1.2-beta2 is out! http://dot.kde.org/1025176121/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9J1iW72KcVAmwbhARAigAAKCrtH2EFKUK0n65b/jAlAmyxY0aDACcDl4o
64otbO+RPsakj4HjgLfVC/A=
=DZWm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----