The "E" in "KDE" (more or less was: KDE RC Authority)

Piotr Szymanski djurban at linuxpl.org
Fri Jul 5 22:17:52 BST 2002


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Neil Stevens (5/07/2002 22:49):
> It is easy if you don't choose to make it hard on users.  Reguarly telling
> users that their app doesn't exist anymore is an easy way to make things
> hard on users.
I think that it is better to have one big app in kde (not every app requires a 
seperata release cycle!) that has the functionality of 10+ small apps, than 
having 10+ small apps, every one of them use similar code to connect to the 
server/handle msgs , chats and dcc. Imagine that I have an msn account, a icq 
account and a yahoo account, I would not say that it is the most effective 
and comfortable way of working, but if we use one app with plugins, the 
situation is changed and those who use only kit will only enable the aim 
plugin and will not notice a thing.
Which solutions makes it harder on users? 

> That said, I'd agree equally with making a blanket decision that *no*
> clients tied to proprietary servers should be allowed in kdenetwork - not
> Kit, not a Kopete plugin, nothing.  I'd agree with removing Kit, but only
> for the right reason.
Yes let us remove all IMs from kde, then let us just count lost users... If 
you remove kit and bring kopete, you do lose any of the functionality, do 
you? 

> Tastes differ.  Some people enjoy rewriting entire frameworks in the course
> of writing their app.  That's why it's so hard to find big apps that
> follow standards: as a project grows, you're bound to get enough framework
> rewriters that your app gets its own framework.
Yes and if we find one, than we do not include it because there are plenty of 
small ones :).

> "grow to the same end goal?"  So you reject the notion that two similar
> apps might have different goals?
I reject the idea of having two similar apps realising different goal, because 
it is for me a waste of code, space, and translators effort, which have to 
translate similar docs, GUI can be roughly translated with a big success, but 
docs can not.
- -- 
!: Piotr Szymanski | LinuxPL Developer  | KDE i18n-pl coordinator
@: djurban at linuxpl.org | Homepage: should be ready by August
&: LinuxPL.org: layout (done);php engine(due to September)
#: GG: 2300264 | ICQ: 12622400 
%: "Give evil nothing to oppose, and it will destroy itself." -Tsunami Shijo 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE9Jg0AFie3dglPmVIRAj+qAJ9Wzl9nSpAvB/gwbSbfw9tvJ+nm2gCgi4LY
agx0fNyZKYiId5GDQYMnR00=
=kcDo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list