Help wanted: Re: bugs.kde.org rejects tonight's CVS as outdated

[Maks Orlovich]

On Friday 05 July 2002 11:21 am, Rob Kaper wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:47:47AM +0200, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > > There's a code version and a release name.
> > > Feel free to express your opinion to the developers of RPM.
> >
> > For further explanation: for RPM 3.1a1 is "later" than "3.1". so people
> > having 3.1 alpha 1 rpms installed would not be able to "upgrade" to the
> > release rpms.
>
> Would *dash* blabla (-devel) be "earlier" than "3.1" ?
>
> If so, 3.1-devel as code version would make sense, like this:

It wouldn't make sense since -devel is being used by most RPM distros for 
packages containing headers, .so links, and other information of interest to 
developers only.. 

-Maksim