KDE 3.1: delayed

Michael Brade brade at kde.org
Sat Dec 7 18:57:56 GMT 2002

On Friday 06 December 2002 15:18, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Fre, 06 Dez 2002, Michael Brade wrote:
> > too wrong about the number of bugreports. I'm responsible for KDE 3.1 in
> > my university and people say 3.1 is not as stable as 3.1rcX.
> huh? You do realize that there is no "3.1" yet ?
Yes :-) But I'm using cvs KDE_3_1_BRANCH, so the little Students don't get the 
difference - the about box even says KDE 3.1.1, cool, no? SCNR ;-)

> > No idea about this,
> > fact is that khtml and kmail are crashing quite often :-/
> about khtml: reproduceable? where?
Well, see my latest reports on bko. Not a single one is reproducable, I 
advised everybody in our RBG to save the backtraces immediately and send them 
to me. Then I'll try to reproduce and choose the useful ones for bko. 
Hopefully this helps a little...

Michael Brade;                 KDE Developer, Student of Computer Science
  |-mail: echo brade !#|tr -d "c oh"|s\e\d 's/e/\@/2;s/$/.org/;s/bra/k/2'
  °--web: http://www.kde.org/people/michaelb.html

KDE 3: The Next Generation in Desktop Experience

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-core-devel/attachments/20021207/a5dfb2c3/attachment.sig>

More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list