KDE 3.1: delayed
brade at kde.org
Sat Dec 7 18:57:56 GMT 2002
On Friday 06 December 2002 15:18, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> On Fre, 06 Dez 2002, Michael Brade wrote:
> > too wrong about the number of bugreports. I'm responsible for KDE 3.1 in
> > my university and people say 3.1 is not as stable as 3.1rcX.
> huh? You do realize that there is no "3.1" yet ?
Yes :-) But I'm using cvs KDE_3_1_BRANCH, so the little Students don't get the
difference - the about box even says KDE 3.1.1, cool, no? SCNR ;-)
> > No idea about this,
> > fact is that khtml and kmail are crashing quite often :-/
> about khtml: reproduceable? where?
Well, see my latest reports on bko. Not a single one is reproducable, I
advised everybody in our RBG to save the backtraces immediately and send them
to me. Then I'll try to reproduce and choose the useful ones for bko.
Hopefully this helps a little...
Michael Brade; KDE Developer, Student of Computer Science
|-mail: echo brade !#|tr -d "c oh"|s\e\d 's/e/\@/2;s/$/.org/;s/bra/k/2'
KDE 3: The Next Generation in Desktop Experience
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
More information about the kde-core-devel