KDE 3.1: delayed
navindra at cs.mcgill.ca
Thu Dec 5 23:56:22 GMT 2002
Dirk Mueller <mueller at kde.org> wrote:
> I neither like any of them, but I prefer to go with b), as it also allows
> for other bugs which have been reported to be fixed. For an impression just
> have a look at the lately steadily rising open bug count on
Well, no use in rushing it, I suppose, although there will be a *lot*
of disappointed people. I have people asking me almost everyday when
KDE 3.1 will be out... (even in person!). So I guess we should
announce the new schedule soonish and inform the users. An RC5 will
probably keep them happy for a while.
What are the other disadvantages? Will the fact that HEAD is now open
be a big problem?
What's the policy for committing to the KDE 3.1 branch?
More information about the kde-core-devel