bugs.kde.org -> bugzilla??
lucy-ples at mtu-net.ru
Wed Aug 28 18:52:09 BST 2002
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 4:22 pm, Daniel Naber wrote:
| On Tuesday 27 August 2002 10:48, Vadim Plessky wrote:
| > Agreed.
| > And IMHO quality of bugs reported to bugs.kde.org is *much higher* than
| > for Mozilla.
| The problem with Mozilla is that they for some reason don't really try to
| avoid duplicates. We will have a wizard that does exactly that (similar to
| the current one, but better).
Good to know.
I have tried previous version of Wizard, it was *too slow* to be useful.
| > I am regualry checking KHTML/KJS bugs, so far I haven't found fake
| > e-mail address.
| Maybe not fake, but people very often simply don't reply to questions. I
| think logging in (for submitting bugs, not for searching) is a good idea.
It's the same as in the "real world"/business world.
Sometimes you need to ask your partner (to do something) 3, 4, 6 times - to
get it done. That's why companies still need *managers* (in good meaning of
this word), and those managers *complement* clever computer systems :-)
33 Window Decorations and 6 Widget Styles for KDE
More information about the kde-core-devel