?Two Certificate Managers? (Re: regarding KPF)

[Matthias Welwarsky]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 18 April 2002 22:14, Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Thursday 18 April 2002 21:31, George Staikos wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > especially since our certificate generation
> > code is not done.
>
> Kalle just committed a working kdenetwork/certmanager ;-)
>
... while merging AEGYPTEN_BRANCH, i bet. Wonderful. Now we have two 
certificate managers, one for KSSL and one for KMail. They hopefully use the 
same data base, do they? Duplicating the place where Certificates are stored 
would be plain stupid.

I talked to Karl-Heinz Zimmermann at the Cebit fair and pointed out that there 
already was a certificate manager for KSSL and asked why they didn't use the 
existing one instead of writing an own version. His reaction was like "I'm 
shocked" then. So, I hope this has been resolved and you have come to the 
conclusion that duplicating functionality in different modules has a good 
reason whatsoever. However, you'd probably have a hard time convincing me.

regards,
	Matze
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8v8sSANO+fpRuZ2IRAj/oAKCOcdSDAMQFd7+jcEnCzqpFIJ3ncgCeL506
uskrNQSkbqPtyt86pN/q5xE=
=Zolo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----