Inconsistency in ioslave naming
Stephan Kulow
coolo at kde.org
Mon Apr 15 10:17:34 BST 2002
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 14 April 2002 22:28, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> On Sunday 14 April 2002 01:12 am, Volker Augustin wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just noticed that all slaves except the fish slave in kdebase/kioslave
> > are simply named after the protocol whereas the fish slave directory is
> > named kio_fish. Shouldn't that be simply "fish"?
>
> Yes, It should, but I thought it wasn't worth the hassle to change it. But
> if the concensus is that it should be changed then I will hapilly change
> it.
I would change it. There is nothing to be lost, if you just move the files
on the server. There is no branch in them, so it should be safe.
Greetings, Stephan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8upquwFSBhlBjoJYRAtdnAJwKJjjiicEFjBK/3KGXiJBjzyS2fwCgrOzK
EISrWld+zqj2EWBzh5e4axU=
=Cpzz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-core-devel
mailing list