SVG icons

Christoph Cullmann crossfire at babylon2k.de
Sun Apr 7 22:03:33 BST 2002


On Sunday 07 April 2002 19:18, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
> On Sunday 07 April 2002 18:56, Werner Trobin wrote:
> > On Sunday 07 April 2002 18:49, Nikolas Zimmermann wrote:
> > > On Sunday 07 April 2002 18:56, Torsten Rahn wrote:
> > > > Am Sonntag, 7. April 2002 10:32 schrieb Nikolas Zimmermann:
> > > > > On Saturday 06 April 2002 22:52, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > > > > > On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 03:50:22PM +0200, Nikolas Zimmermann 
wrote:
> > > > > > > i wonder if i may commit the SVG iconloader stuff.
> > > > > > > The ksvgtopng utility is also included.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Do you mean support for 'live-rendering' of SVG icons in the
> > > > > > iconloader or a way of rendering an SVG icontheme to a standard
> > > > > > png icontheme at build time? Or a combination of it (like,
> > > > > > leaving the iconloader as-is but having free scaling in
> > > > > > KonqIconView for svg icon themes) ?
> > > > >
> > > > > Right, a combination.
> > > > > On compiletime ksvgtopng, would convert the kde svg icons
> > > > > to png's for all standard sizes.
> > > > > And for everything else, live rendering.
> > > >
> > > > Sounds good to me.
> > >
> > > In cvs..
> >
> > Okay, a bit late, but I'd like to object :-)
> >
> > kdelibs is bloated enough, no need for libart in kdecore. I count only
> > few real ksvg* files, and I would be fine with that, but please don't put
> > a libart fork into kdecore.
> >
> > Related to all that is the question what we want to do with all the other
> > libart forks in KDE CVS... :-}
>
> Problem is, many use own patches
> ksvg: one patch which could be included into libart cvs, one HACKY nasty
> one, which is not ready for libart releases.
>
> kopainter: has only the first patch, from ksvg, which is ok
> kdecore/svgicons: contains also the "first" patch, and is stripped down
>
> All LGPL, no license issues (speaking about svgicons)
>
> What shall we do?
I sit here with a lame & expensive collection, but the little overhead of this 
patch is really not very bad for what we get with it ;) If we remove the 
stuff, we only add one more depency for kdelibs (you could say: optional, but 
I think svg icons are the way to go for the later releases, seems to be much 
more "reusable"). Would vote for let the stuff be where it is now in kdecore.

cu
Christoph 

>
> Bye
>  Bye
>   Niko
>
> > Ciao,
> > Werner

-- 
Christoph "Crossfire" Cullmann
Kate/KDE developer
cullmann at kde.org
http://kate.kde.org




More information about the kde-core-devel mailing list