Proposal unify back our release schedules

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Freitag, 19. April 2024 14:26:45 CEST Sune Vuorela wrote:
> It might make sense for plasma and gear to follow the same schedule. But
> I really like what we have going with frameworks.
> 
> One issue that leads to the 'frameworks stable, release monthly' was
> that sometimes, even often, you need to add a *feature* to a framework
> to address a *bug* in an application.
> 
> If you can't relatively quickly start requiring the fixed framework, you
> end up working around it in the application and forget fixing it in the
> framework.

I don't follow. How does a quicker Frameworks release cycle helps with this? 
Do you want to bump the Frameworks requirement in a patch release of the app 
to get the fix into the patch release?

Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20240420/818b63e7/attachment-0001.sig>