is a BSL licensed service acceptable for sysadminy use cases?

[Andrius Štikonas]

2021 m. gegužės 28 d., penktadienis 11:25:49 BST Harald Sitter rašė:
> On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 11:43 AM Sune Vuorela <nospam at vuorela.dk> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-05-26, Anna “CyberTailor” <cyber at sysrq.in> wrote:
> > >> After 36 months, the code becomes Apache-2.0 licensed (the conversion period)
> > >
> > > So you can use old sentry versions, which are open source.
> > >
> >
> > +1. I think we should support free and open source software.
> 
> I do too. I'm curious though: How does using the 4 year old software
> support the software more than using the eventually 4 year old
> software?
> 
> HS
> 
By the way, isn't it 3 year old software. That probably doesn't fundamentally
change the discussion. Although, if you use Debian stable or Centos, you probably
are using a lot of 3 year old software.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20210528/941d2410/attachment.sig>