Website content licensing

[Paul Brown]

On martes, 8 de septiembre de 2020 15:16:26 (CEST) Boudewijn Rempt wrote:
> On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 14:43:51 CEST Carl Schwan wrote:
> > CC-BY-SA-4.0: this is the preferred license for the documentation but
> > it is less problematic for sharing it, but it's still not a great feet
> > for sharing it on a not FOSS related media.
> 
> *.krita.org is currently CC-BY-SA-3.0, not 4.0, but that's just because we
> didn't update it:
> 
> https://krita.org/en/about/website/
> 
> We choose this because we explicitly do not want others to reuse the content
> without worrying about copyright.

FWIW, dot.kde.org content is licensed under CC By 3.0, as is the content on 
YouTube (the only  CC license available). I personally favour CC By SA, but I 
do not have very strong feelings about this as long as attribution is 
required.

Cheers

Paul
-- 
Promotion & Communication

www: http://kde.org
Mastodon: https://mastodon.technology/@kde
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/kde/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/kdecommunity
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/kde