Website content licensing

[Boudewijn Rempt]

On Tuesday, 8 September 2020 14:43:51 CEST Carl Schwan wrote:

> CC-BY-SA-4.0: this is the preferred license for the documentation but
> it is less problematic for sharing it, but it's still not a great feet
> for sharing it on a not FOSS related media.

*.krita.org is currently CC-BY-SA-3.0, not 4.0, but that's just because we didn't update it:

https://krita.org/en/about/website/

We choose this because we explicitly do not want others to reuse the content without worrying about copyright.


-- 
https://www.krita.org