Licensing policy change proposal

Krešimir Čohar kcohar at gmail.com
Tue Jan 29 05:53:14 GMT 2019


> I think this is a problem. Both "not characterize as FOSS", and "with
restrictions". And basically the core of this.

I agree :D
It's a problem... That's why I got the ball rolling on this really long
thread.

Can a license with restrictions truly be public domain?

On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 6:51 AM Sune Vuorela <nospam at vuorela.dk> wrote:

> On 2019-01-29, Krešimir Čohar <kcohar at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I wouldn't necessarily characterize the Unsplash license as FOSS, but
> > rather public domain with restrictions (not entirely public domain). I
> also
>
> I think this is a problem. Both "not characterize as FOSS", and "with
> restrictions". And basically the core of this.
>
> /Sune
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20190129/78a0237a/attachment.html>


More information about the kde-community mailing list