Licensing policy change proposal

[Nate Graham]

On 1/27/19 11:39 AM, Ivan Čukić wrote:
> I'm generally leaning against licenses like these - even if authors (of code,
> of art, etc.) allow us to forget them, I like giving credit where credit's
> due.

Just because the license *allows* non-attribution, that doesn't mean we 
have to not attribute them, right? In the patch in question [1] we are
preserving authorship information. Seems like the nice thing to do even 
if the license doesn't require it.

Nate


[1] https://phabricator.kde.org/D18078.