Telemetry Policy

[Thomas Baumgart]

Hi Volker et al.

On Sonntag, 13. August 2017 11:47:28 CEST Volker Krause wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> during the KUserFeedback BoF at Akademy there was quite some interest in
> collecting telemetry data in KDE applications. But before actually
> implementing that we agreed to define the rules under which we would want to
> do that. I've tried to put the input we collected during Akademy into
> proper wording below. What do you think? Did I miss anything?

Very good. I follow the discussion about KUserFeedback from the beginning and 
representing the KDE application dealing with the personal finances this is a 
very delicate topic for our application.

The details of the policy are very well layed out and written with the user 
and his control over data and device in mind. This is where some for-profits 
are able to learn a thing or two from us.

Despite the fact that the data should be aggregated, anonymized as much as 
possible on the source deveice, I think it would make sense to guarantee an 
encrypted transfer of the raw records from the user's computer to the KDE 
infra. What do you think?

Keep going. This is wonderful.

-- 

Regards

Thomas Baumgart

https://www.telegram.org/       Telegram, the better WhatsApp
-------------------------------------------------------------
The only 'intuitive' interface is the nipple. After that, it's all learned.
 -- Bruce Ediger, bediger at teal.csn.org, on X interfaces
-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 846 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20170813/8f5a5ff8/attachment.sig>