Applications Lifecycle Policy

[Luca Beltrame]

Il giorno Wed, 05 Jul 2017 21:37:09 +0200
Martin Flöser <mgraesslin at kde.org> ha scritto:

> To me the review process always felt weird and also like a relict
> from other times. I contributed to overall KDE something like 100 k

While projects with strong stewardship like KWin, Plasma or Krita
(*not* implying there aren't others: I'm mentioning the ones
that come to mind) ensure a continued review and code quality, how
would you ensure that, without review periods (or anything that can
subsitute them, if anything better) distributions and integrators don't
get code dumps of dubious quality?

I see this as a concrete risk.

-- 
Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team
GPG key ID: A29D259B
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Firma digitale OpenPGP
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20170705/4e946c21/attachment.sig>