Applications Lifecycle Policy

[Ingo Klöcker]

On Tuesday 04 July 2017 23:34:20 Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> What I meant to propose was more that instead of being initially in a
> temporary location,
> and then having to choose one of "proper" ones and go through review,
> we would instead
> start with a permanent location and then you "could" become part of a
> release with requirements
> and therefore review. In general I just think the barrier to release a
> project from KDE infrastructure
> should be lowered not raised.

To me this sounds as if you want the KDE infrastructure to become a 
dumping ground for low-quality, untranslated stuff, i.e. just like 
github except with the KDE badge. Yes, I'm exaggerating, but essentially 
that's how I understand what you are saying.

I agree with Albert, Ben, and Luigi, that we (at least the four of us) 
don't want this.


Regards,
Ingo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20170705/d85b2e02/attachment.sig>