KDE Licensing Policy Updates

[Riccardo Iaconelli]

On 23 September 2016 at 18:52, Luigi Toscano <luigi.toscano at tiscali.it> wrote:
> Still, as I mentioned, it would introduced problems if we move documentation
> forth and back from wikis to other formats, and also with mixing content from
> older documentation. I still don't buy the "cumbersome" argument, I don't
> think we use it the controversial parts like invariant section etc - do we?
> Trying to to relicense the existing documentation from FDL to FDL+CC as a
> start would be the best thing, but I think it would be complicated.

So yeah, FDL is impractical as it requires the full copy of the
license to be printed alongside with every printed copy of the
material covered by it.
...and doesn't really offer any more benefits I am aware of...

Bye,
-Riccardo
-- 
Pace Peace Paix Paz Frieden Pax Pokój Friður Fred Béke 和平
Hasiti Lapé Hetep Malu Mир Wolakota Santiphap Irini Peoch שלום
Shanti Vrede Baris Rój Mír Taika Rongo Sulh Mir Py'guapy 평화