[kde-community] retiring unmaintained modules?

Boudewijn Rempt boud at valdyas.org
Tue Jan 13 20:46:52 UTC 2015


Then I think that all these kmail 1 bugs should be moved en masse to 
kmail2. Either they are useful for kmail2, or they are not; if they are 
not, they should be closed as unmaintained, and if they are, they are 
kmail2 bugs.

On Tue, 13 Jan 2015, laurent Montel wrote:

> Le Sunday 11 January 2015 23:33:09 Luigi Toscano a écrit :
>> Boudewijn Rempt ha scritto:
>>>> I guess we should also be really careful, as you said some software is
>>>> "done"
>>>> and the fact that it didn't get any development doesn't mean it should be
>>>> killed.
>>>
>>> Of course. But kmail (not kmail2) is _dead_. It's bugs should be closed.
>>
>> I would ask Laurent first. He said in the past that the UI part of
>> kmail2 is really close to kmail1. Are those bugs "real" bugs and not
>> wishlists, right?
>
> Hi,
> Indeed Kmail1 is dead, but some bugs associate to kmail1 can be reproduce in
> kmail2 and in the past I fixed some kmail1 bugs
> (All wishlist in kmail1 were closed or moved to kmail2)
>
> After that I don't want to see all kmail1 bug removed from bugzilla, as I
> write some bug can be reproduce in kmail2
>
> So please don't close them.
>
> Regards.
>
>> Ciao
>
> -- 
> Laurent Montel | laurent.montel at kdab.com | KDE/Qt Senior Software Engineer
> KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
> Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53,  http://www.kdab.fr
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kde-community mailing list
> kde-community at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
>


More information about the kde-community mailing list