[kde-community] licence policy updates
cordlandwehr at kde.org
Thu Mar 13 12:57:04 UTC 2014
On Tuesday 18 February 2014 11:48:47 Jonathan Riddell wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 08:34:51PM +0100, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Do you guys think that it would make sense to explicitely suggest that
> > applications use the "GPL version 2 or version 3 or later versions
> > the membership of KDE e.V. " variant unless they really have special
> > aim to improve inter-app code shareability?
> Added to the draft
Hi, I wonder if the refence in #13 should point to Section 4 (instead of
Section 3). Also the second reference in #13 could directly point to
Section 5 instead of speaking over "other source files".
On a different topic, I think it would benefit the policy to group #4 to #12
to a common enumeration point like "Licenses" (or any better wording) and
indent them by one level. In my opinion, this helps to easier spot where the
special license requirements for which content type is and ends the mixing
with general license policy information. That would mean, having the
license information for the content types
* source files contained in libraries
* other source files
* cmake modules
* windows installer files
* standalone media files
* other data
on a second indentation level.
Further, putting these content type names into italic would also improve
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kde-community