[kde-community] KDE Manifesto Revision (round 2)

Marta Rybczynska rybczynska at gmail.com
Sun Nov 24 10:17:15 GMT 2013


Thanks for the work, Kevin et al. I like the new version better than the
older one.

Just a doubt about two lines:
Licensing policy must be respected.
branding guidelines are respected.

It's either both 'must be' or 'are'. I'd say rather 'are' when looking at
the other points.

Cheers,
Marta


On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 1:26 AM, Jos Poortvliet <jospoortvliet at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Thursday 21 November 2013 17:07:08 Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > Hello community,
> >
> > So after the three threads I started a couple of weeks ago, I collected
> the
> > feedback (thanks to everyone who participated!) and made a new patch out
> > of it.
> >
> > It should cover everything which was discussed previously. So please
> review
> > that new patch, and let me know if you still have some worries. If
> there's
> > no objection on that patch until next thursday, then I'll bring it up to
> > the membership for voting.
> >
> > Regards.
>
> I love it. Shorter and more to the point. Also - it might have been a pain
> to
> go through so many long threads but I agree with Valorie that the result is
> worth it and it's great to see the process work so well. Hugs to everybody
> :D
> _______________________________________________
> kde-community mailing list
> kde-community at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-community
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20131124/195bcde7/attachment.htm>


More information about the kde-community mailing list