[kde-community] Discussion: KDE Manifesto, "web services"

[Kevin Ottens]

On Tuesday 12 November 2013 00:23:29 Lydia Pintscher wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Ingo Klöcker <kloecker at kde.org> wrote:
> > Is the "which is approved by the KDE system administration team" really
> > needed? I think it could be left out. If the fact that the action plan
> > needs to be approved should be stressed then "approved" could be added
> > before action plan, i.e.
> > 
> > * Online services associated with the project are either hosted on
> > KDE infrastructure or have an approved action plan that ensures
> > continuity
> 
> I think this part is actually good to have, yes. It's good to be clear
> about who should have the final say in this. (And it makes sense to me
> to have this be the sysadmin team.) Otherwise we'll end up in a
> situation again where it is no-one's responsibility and no-one really
> has the power to say yes or no.

I tend to agree with Lydia there. We're so large it's easy to fall in the "no 
one responsibility" trap.

Regards.
-- 
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net

KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/attachments/20131112/2f16dca1/attachment.sig>