add_test vs. ecm_add_test
Saro Engels
ps_ml at gmx.de
Sun May 4 18:17:43 UTC 2014
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi everybody,
I just need to modify quite a lot of code locations anyway to make the
tests run correctly on windows, so I want to ask in advance:
I have found the ecm_add_test macro, but for some packages I have
looked at it is not used. So the question is whether we want to ensure
that it is used everywhere, whether we want to keep an undecided setup
(whoever uses it, uses it) or whether we do not want to use it.
My personal opinion is probably keep it like it is or remove
ecm_add_test but I'd like to have some more opinions about that first.
regards,
Patrick
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/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=FSZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Kde-buildsystem
mailing list