C standard

[Dimitri John Ledkov]

On 30 January 2014 12:02, David Faure <faure at kde.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 January 2014 12:40:20 Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On terça-feira, 28 de janeiro de 2014 15:19:37, Andrius da Costa Ribas
> wrote:
>> > MSVC (at least vc2010) is C89 for C code, changing it to C99 on GCC may
>> > lead to changes that break MSVC build (since almost everything is mostly
>> > tested on linux/gcc only).
>>
>> Then make it a requirement to use MSVC 2013 at a minimum on Windows.
>
> I would rather we don't do that, as long as Qt itself doesn't require it.
>
> Surely we don't have so much C code that this really matters?
>

C++11 is required, which is the default of MSVC 2013, so MSVC 2013
(free or paid editions) is required to compile C++ portions. It's
unwise to require or suggest mismatched C and C++ compilers.
-- 
Regards,

Dimitri.