Anything left to do in CMake ?

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Sunday 11 March 2012, Yury G. Kudryashov wrote:
> Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I think things are looking quite good, and we got most of the things we
> > wanted to get into cmake in.
> 
> I think that we need dependent Export sets support.
> 
> Example: strigi.
> The project consists of several repos. You can either build these repos one
> by one, or download all using "meta" repo, and build the whole package.
> 
> I think that each component (libstreamanalyzer etc.) should install its own
> Export file. But if you build the whole project, you get a library in
> export B that depends on a library in export A.

Maybe it's not a good idea to offer two different ways how strigi is built.
I would see this as an inconvenience because somebody tries to do something 
unsupported.

Alex