KDEInstallDirs.cmake in extra-cmake-modules
Kevin Ottens
ervin at kde.org
Sat Feb 18 17:05:33 UTC 2012
On Saturday 18 February 2012 18:01:26 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Saturday 18 February 2012, Kevin Ottens wrote:
> > On Friday 17 February 2012 00:41:49 Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > > On Thursday 16 February 2012, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > > > I'd still go with kf5.
> > > >
> > > > > I think we should keep the "kde" in the string, so the name stays
> > > > > present. That's why I also named the file "KDEInstallDirs.cmake" and
> > > > > not "KF5InstallDirs.cmake".
> > > > >
> > > > > Comments ?
> > > >
> > > > I think kf5 is a name that kde can own anyway, and which we can use.
> > >
> > > I mean, "kde" is a well-known name, we should not hide it.
> >
> > That's trying to put some marketing details in a technical aspect IMHO. It
> > should map to the product, and product code name if KF5.
>
> No, it's not.
> See my other mail.
> Currently there is no "KF5", and there are no plans to have one.
> Instead we have plans to make a set of libraries which are called together
> "KDE frameworks".
>
> KDEInstallDirs.cmake is in extra-cmake-modules since yesterday.
> This is definitely not a "KF5InstallDirs.cmake". There is nothing in it
> which is KF5-specific.
Sorry, I apparently misunderstood what you meant or replied at the wrong place
(as you can see in the other thread I didn't ask for file rename). I was
talking about the variable names, we used to have a KDE4_ prefix I just meant
it should be a KF5_ prefix in such cases now.
My apologies for the noise then. :-)
Regards.
--
Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net
KDAB - proud patron of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20120218/9a40d57c/attachment.sig>
More information about the Kde-buildsystem
mailing list