Review Request: Make kdepim-runtime configuration less verbose

[Allen Winter]

> On Aug. 20, 2012, 4:37 p.m., Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote:
> > Doesn't the same change also apply to the other find_package() calls there?

Yes, I'm also curious about why these 2 are so much more irritating than any other find_packages()

Aleix, can you paste the annoying parts?  Maybe we can convince the libkolab folks to make their stuff less babbly.


- Allen


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/#review17759
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 20, 2012, 3:22 p.m., Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 20, 2012, 3:22 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Build System and KDEPIM.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> in case the package is not required, don't print a ton of debug output but proceed quietly if it's not present.
> 
> the fact that it's not found is already notified by the log anyway.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt d91ed8a 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106101/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Aleix Pol Gonzalez
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20120820/0a3d7388/attachment.html>