[PATCH] Beautified MacroLogFeature

[Alexander Neundorf]

On Thursday 19 February 2009, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> On Thursday 19 February 2009 18:23:01 Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > > I agree with Allen -- when I compile a module, the information "you are
> > > missing this and that" is much more important than the information "I
> > > found this and that". For the missing stuff I might have to take
> > > action. For the found stuff there is no problem, so there is little
> > > point in filling 3 screens with "I found this and that, so you'll get
> > > such and such features"... we don't list the features that one gets in
> > > all cases, either
> > >
> > > :-) I think all that's needed is a short confirmation that "foo" was
> > > : found
> > >
> > > after you installed it.
> >
> > well, OK then. I will just use my own local copy for K3b then, because
> > frankly, I really don't like the output as it is now.
>
> Sorry, this sounds way to aggressive. And that was not my intention. What I
> should have written is:

No problem.
Actually I agree with you, and also also agree that your version looks nicer.
But one of the things was that there should be only one line per package, so 
it's easy to grep for stuff.
And it's also correct that the things which were found shouldn't take too much 
space.

Alex