[PATCH] Beautified MacroLogFeature

[Sebastian Trüg]

On Thursday 19 February 2009 18:23:01 Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> > I agree with Allen -- when I compile a module, the information "you are
> > missing this and that" is much more important than the information "I
> > found this and that". For the missing stuff I might have to take action.
> > For the found stuff there is no problem, so there is little point in
> > filling 3 screens with "I found this and that, so you'll get such and
> > such features"... we don't list the features that one gets in all cases,
> > either
> >
> > :-) I think all that's needed is a short confirmation that "foo" was
> > : found
> >
> > after you installed it.
>
> well, OK then. I will just use my own local copy for K3b then, because
> frankly, I really don't like the output as it is now.

Sorry, this sounds way to aggressive. And that was not my intention. What I 
should have written is:

"No worries. I will just use a local copy with a formatting of my liking in 
K3b. :)"

But just as a sidenote: I always like to know what dependencies are for. There 
might be some I don't need...

Cheers,
Sebastian