FindBoost.cmake

[Andreas Pakulat]

On 10.07.08 15:02:15, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> On Friday 04 July 2008 14:43:29 Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > On 04.07.08 13:25:55, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > David Faure wrote:
> > > >On Friday 04 July 2008, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > >> Andreas Pakulat wrote:
> > > >> >> I want to change this. Is it o. k. if i do this and commit this
> > > >> >> change next monday?
> > > >> >
> > > >> >+1 from me, the one in kdevplatform is 95% identical to what CMake
> > > >> > 2.6 ships so I don't expect any breakages with it.
> > > >>
> > > >> Why don't we use the official CMake 2.6 one then?
> > > >
> > > >Because currently KDE has to build with CMake 2.4 too.
> > > >
> > > >Or did you mean copying the one from cmake 2.6 for now? (i.e. ironing
> > > > out the remaining 5% difference)?
> > >
> > > I meant copying theirs into our sources.
> > >
> > > In other words: those 5% different, are they justified?
> >
> > Thats the code that actually depends on CMake 2.6 features :) And
> > recently there have been some cleanups/fixes for CMake CVS (will be
> > backported to 2.6.1) that require CMake 2.6.
> >
> > So as soon as we depend on 2.6 we can just rip it out completely, until
> > then the kdevplatform version is a 2.4-compatible mostly-identical
> > version of what CMake has.
> 
> RC1 - kdesdk break boost detection in Mandriva for kdesdk.
> We have our headers in /usr/include/boost and libraries are in standard 
> /usr/lib or /usr/lib64
> 
> Was working previously on 4.0.85

What does CMakeCache.txt say about boost? Whats the error message?

Does /usr/include/boost/config.hpp exist? Does it contain a proper
#define BOOST_VERSION and #define BOOST_LIB_VERSION? What boost version
is that?

On my debian box with headers in /usr/include/boost it works fine both
with CMake 2.6.0 and 2.4.5 (the latter is Kitwares original package).

Andreas

-- 
You are magnetic in your bearing.