moving automoc to kdesupport

[Matthias Kretz]

On Wednesday 23 April 2008, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> > FWIW, if kwsys has an adequate replacement for QProcess I might just
> > volunteer to do the porting and get my feet wet with the STL.
>
> If nobody objects, I'll copy automoc tomorrow to kdesupport
> (is there actually a svn copy ?)
> I guess we can name it "automoc4" then ?

svn cp sure exists. svn mv is just svn cp + svn rm

"automoc4" sounds good. I don't think we need the KDE or Qt prefix.

How about the last patch I posted? AFAICT the cost of running automoc 
unconditionally (if it doesn't touch anything unnecessarily) isn't very high. 
Anybody else tried the patch?

-- 
________________________________________________________
Matthias Kretz (Germany)                            <><
http://Vir.homelinux.org/
MatthiasKretz at gmx.net, kretz at kde.org,
Matthias.Kretz at urz.uni-heidelberg.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20080424/6ac592f9/attachment.pgp