Am Freitag, 28. April 2006 18:07 schrieb Alexander Neundorf: > Doesn't this give a cyclic dependency ? > s5b.moc depends on s5b.cpp, and s5b.cpp depends on s5b.moc because it > includes it ? Wow, I thought you was beyond that :) s5b.cpp does not depend on s5b.moc, s5b.o does. Greetings, Stephan