[Kde-pim] Difference in compilation (Re: [STATUS] Building KDEPIM with CMake)
Allen Winter
winter at kde.org
Mon Apr 17 15:16:46 CEST 2006
On Wednesday 12 April 2006 14:24, Allen Winter wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 April 2006 13:27, Dirk Mueller wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 12. April 2006 18:38, David Faure wrote:
> >
> > > One difference is the lack of -DPIC, but could this matter? This is too
> > > lowlevel for me, let's see what kde-buildsystem has to say ;)
> >
> > We use -fno-common because we don't want common symbols. Why you have common
> > symbols with unsermake is a mystery to me, but it boilds down to an unsermake
> > bug.
> >
> But Dirk, with -fno-common I have no way of linking this yacc/lex generated code.
> Can we make an exception in the case of kdepim/libkholidays?
> Is there a way to put back common symbols for this subdir only?
>
> I do have hopes (if Cornelius' kode stuff can support it) of replacing libkholidays
> with a brand new, non-yacc/lex, implementation. So this issue may disappear one day.
>
Ok, now that I've had a few days away and the braincells have had a little rest...
I can say that the fix I put in last week, using extern, is the right fix for this issue.
This thread is done.
Thanks for listening to my ravings,
Allen
--
Let's Keep the Political Talk Out of KDE PLEASE
More information about the Kde-buildsystem
mailing list