kparts with "lib" prefix ?

[Thiago Macieira]

Matt Rogers wrote:
>> There are some which have the "lib" prefix and some don't, e.g.
>> libarkpart.so vs. kviewerpart.so . Does this matter ? Is one scheme
>> prefered ? If so, is then the other one only not completely correct or
>> can this already be considered a bug ?
>
>No, it doesn't matter. it's just a filename for the library. I don't see
> a bug here at all, just somebody's preference.

I'd recommend that they don't get named with "lib" prefix.

That way, it'll be easier to spot what you can link to but not dlopen 
(libs) and what you can dlopen but not link to (modules).

-- 
  Thiago Macieira  -  thiago (AT) macieira.info - thiago (AT) kde.org
    PGP/GPG: 0x6EF45358; fingerprint:
    E067 918B B660 DBD1 105C  966C 33F5 F005 6EF4 5358

5. Swa he géanhwearf tó timbran, and hwonne he cóm, lá! Unix cwæð "Hello, 
World". Ǽfre ǽghwilc wæs glæd and seo woruld wæs fréo.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-buildsystem/attachments/20051211/0620a493/attachment.pgp