PyKF5 bindings generator improvements out for review.

[Shaheed Haque]

I've posted the first 3 reviews in Phabricator, not least to make sure I
have understood the process. Feedback welcome on:

https://phabricator.kde.org/D4509
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4510
https://phabricator.kde.org/D4511

Thanks, Shaheed

On 6 February 2017 at 18:45, Shaheed Haque <srhaque at theiet.org> wrote:

> Luca, Luigi, all,
>
> I take responsibility for not being aware of the expectations here (it
> seems I have been away from KDE for too long!), so apologies for that. I've
> had a quick look into Phabricator and will look to post the reviews there.
> Steve, I take it you will be OK with that, so I'll close the PRs.
>
> Thanks, Shaheed
>
>
> On 5 February 2017 at 21:25, Luca Beltrame <lbeltrame at kde.org> wrote:
>
>> Il giorno Sun, 5 Feb 2017 14:36:26 +0000
>> Shaheed Haque <srhaque at theiet.org> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hello Shaheed and Steve,
>>
>> > I've reviewed what got merged from PR2 and PR3, and reworked PR4 into
>> > what I hope is a much more manageable form. The results are in PR9:
>> >
>> > https://github.com/ShaheedHaque/extra-cmake-modules/pull/9
>>
>> I hate to be "that guy", but I have to tell you that doing GH pull
>> requests is not the way to go for a number of reasons:
>>
>> - Even if not many touch ECM, it means the few that aren't on GH won't
>>   review your code;
>> - The ongoing review, for the same reason, is in a place inaccessible
>>   to most people with a KDE contributor account;
>> - The KDE Manifesto mandates the use of KDE infrastructure for KDE
>>   projects: this means either Reviewboard (going to get retired) or
>>   Phabricator.
>>
>> Please don't lock out the larger KDE community just for your own
>> convenience.
>>
>> --
>> Luca Beltrame - KDE Forums team
>> GPG key ID: A29D259B
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-bindings/attachments/20170208/be128db5/attachment.html>