No subject

On Friday 17 June 2005 10:44, Richard Dale wrote:
> On the kdebindings at kde.org list, Ashley Winters is discussing his ideas for
> Smoke v2. I would much prefer all new language bindings to use the same
> library for KDE 4. I don't think this affects our recent discussions on the
> look of the api, to me that seems independent of whether or not to use JNI
> or CNI, and/or the Smoke library. He is proposing generating bindings via a
> translation unit dump of the compiled object code to xml, followed by XSLT
> transformations to generate the C++ code for the Smoke lib. It does lose
> the comments in the headers though, and I still think we need a header
> parser to generate the javadoc comments from the doxygen ones. Or to look
> for methods marked with a '@deprecated' tag, and not add them to Smoke

-- Richard