[Kde-bindings] Re: Transition to Git and reorganization of kdebindings

Petr Vaněk petr at scribus.info
Fri Nov 19 20:42:17 UTC 2010

Dne čtvrtek 18 Listopad 2010 01:53:56 Ian Monroe napsal(a):
> The basic problem is that there is difficulty building kdebindings
> without kdelibs. Or at least, there is a perception of a problem. I
> think anyone subscribed to this list is aware of it, since there have
> been a few threads about it. Also to sync with the Qt & KDE release
> cycle in a less confusing fashion.

Any thoughts about to release smoke (gen, basic header file) and smokeqt out 
of KDE? I mean - now it's usualy packaged in kdebindings rpm or deb. It's fine 
but it requires to install all dependecies (kdelibs etc.) to use smoke for 3rd 
party stuff.

Personally I don't have any problem with it (as a KDE/Qt user) but it's very 
hard to use for example non-qt based lib with distro smoke in eg. ubuntu (gtk 

My usecase:
We (my company) are starting to use smoke not only for Qt bindings but for 
"any" c++ lib we need and sometimes it can be real pain to download part of 
KDE stuff to a production server where we need to use for example memcached 
smoke bindings...

I hope you will understand ;)


P.S.: there are no memcached bindings or whatever, but it's planned...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-bindings/attachments/20101119/1487a496/attachment.sig>

More information about the Kde-bindings mailing list