[Kde-bindings] Splitting up the Smoke qt library into modules

[Ian Monroe]

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Arno Rehn <arno at arnorehn.de> wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 October 2009 19:36:35 Richard Dale wrote:
>> While we're discussing BIC changes to the smoke libs, I wonder if it would
>>  be a good idea to split up the libsmokeqt library into small libs. The
>>  small size of the Smoke libs is becoming a big advantage relative to other
>>  bindings libraries, and it we split them up a bit maybe the advantage
>>  would  be larger still. Or is the a performance tradeoff in that searches
>>  for a class or method would have to cross Smoke module boundaries more
>>  often and that would slow things down? It is worth measuring somehow?
> Since it's all cached once it has been looked up, I doubt that the performance
> tradeoff is noticable.

Hey even better. :)

Ian