[Kde-bindings] Common work for Qt4 bindings

[Simon Edwards]

On Tuesday 13 September 2005 12:27, Richard Dale wrote:
> On Saturday 10 September 2005 04:18, Eric Jardim wrote:
> > I still don't now what would be the definitve solution for this, but if we
> > don't do it now and do it right, people will not use it. One of KDE
> > weakness is poor binding. I admit Gnome bindings are not perfect, but are
> > much better that KDE's.
> Ouch! I'm not so sure. The PyQt/PyKDE and QtRuby/Korundum ones are about as 
> complete and well maintained as any other bindings for any other toolkit.

More so, PyKDE, and PyQt in particular have been around for years, are 
commerically supported, run on WIN32, and is used by hundreds of companies. 
PyQt even has a book written about it! It don't think you could describe that 
as weak.

"Under used and under promoted" on the other hand, that you is something you 
could say...

cheers,

-- 
Simon Edwards             | Guarddog Firewall
simon at simonzone.com       | http://www.simonzone.com/software/
Nijmegen, The Netherlands | "ZooTV? You made the right choice."