[Kde-bindings] [Bug 105772] (ruby) request to have the Qt/KDE methods appear in object.methods and .respond_to?

[Gábor Lehel]

Well, you obviously know 10x as much Ruby as I do... but perhaps just
alias the old one over to something different and use that internally,
and show the redefined respond_to? outwards?

On 17 May 2005 16:18:28 -0000, Richard Dale
<Richard_Dale at tipitina.demon.co.uk> wrote:
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
> 
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105772
> 
> ------- Additional Comments From Richard_Dale tipitina demon co uk  2005-05-17 18:18 -------
> On Monday 16 May 2005 16:55, Gábor wrote:
> [bugs.kde.org quoted mail]
> Yes, I agree this should be on the todo list. Certainly it would be nice to
> have the Qt/KDE methods and constants returned via ruby introspection. Also
> the methods callable via DCOP with a DCOPRef could be included.
> 
> It should be possible to change respond_to?, but I don't know if that might
> have unexpected side effects. The C function rb_respond_to() is used to tell
> if a virtual method has been overriden in ruby, and that mechanism might not
> work anymore.
> 
> -- Richard
> _______________________________________________
> Kde-bindings mailing list
> Kde-bindings at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-bindings
> 


-- 
Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.