[Kde-bindings] Argument against the current direction of KDE bindings

Richard Dale Richard_Dale at tipitina.demon.co.uk
Sun Jun 12 20:02:43 UTC 2005

On Sunday 12 June 2005 04:08, Ashley Winters wrote:
> --- Adam Treat <manyoso at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > Hey Everyone, I couldn't keep my mouth shut... I just had to let you
> > know I
> > think we're all barking up the wrong tree with KDE bindings for KDE4.
> >  Most
> > of you have all heard my feelings before, but if not:
> >
> > http://www.kdedevelopers.org/node/view/1150
> And I agreed with him in a back-handed way. :)
> http://jahqueel.blogspot.com/2005/06/smoke-kde-com-win32.html
"Distributed Smoke (aka. DSmoke) would be a relatively simple add-on to the 
built-in marshalling system. "

It already exists! It is called Korundum DCOP support. It uses nested 
method_missing calls to interface with both Smoke, and a remote DCOP call. 

More information about the Kde-bindings mailing list