[Kde-bindings] Qyoto: SIGNALS/SLOTS

[Richard Dale]

On Thursday 22 December 2005 13:08, Arno Rehn wrote:
> Yepp, seems like I took the smokeobject instead of the QObject.
>
> I also think it would be better to do it the SMOKE way, but I really don't
> know how to do that. I looked in the bindings for ruby, but I don't get how
> it was done there. The ruby-bindings don't even work for me.
Have a look at qtruby.h:

struct smokeruby_object {
    bool allocated;
    Smoke *smoke;
    int classId;
    void *ptr;
};

What goes wrong with QtRuby - it would be easier to have it working to compare 
Qyoto against?

-- Richard