[Kde-bindings] Future and status of qtruby (on Windows ?)

[Phil Thompson]

On Thursday 30 September 2004 10:09 pm, Richard Dale wrote:
> On Thursday 30 September 2004 21:53, Phil Thompson wrote:
> > On Thursday 30 September 2004 9:45 pm, Richard Dale wrote:
> > > I believe the PyQt license is cheaper than the standard C++
> > > one, but it doesn't allow you to do C++ development, only python.
> >
> > You are thinking of BlackAdder which is a cut down version of PyQt with
> > an IDE. The full commercial version of PyQt requires the commercial
> > version of Qt.
>
> Ah I see, I didn't realise that. I think you would want to be able to write
> C++ aswell as python or ruby anyway in an in house development project.

Yes. A lot of people produce Python bindings for their legacy core libraries 
and then write new applications using them and PyQt. This is for products to 
be sold as much as in house projects.

Phil