[Kde-bindings] Have we all been blind?

[Adam Treat]

On Saturday 11 January 2003 11:46 pm, Ashley Winters wrote:
> --- Germain Garand <germain at ebooksfrance.com> wrote:
> > Le Dimanche 12 Janvier 2003 03:24, Germain Garand a écrit :
> >
> > Now, frankly, having just tried the latest version of your dumper...
> > it really
> > looks like you did the whole same job in three days ;)
>
> I suppose so!
>
> > Maybe it would make more sense to just take inspiration from their
> > DTD (or
> > adopt it entirely), and avoid the hassle of a big external
> > software...
>
> Umm... their DTD sucks. After further investigation, it's an exact
> mirror of the -fdump-t-u format. If you loaded their XML into ram,
> you'd get the same datastructure my program uses. Obscure, and
> difficult to use. We can do better. The Qt# DTD is closer to what we
> can use, if not perfect either.

We can always change/expand the DTD and we'd certainly be open to this.  I'd 
like to keep some semblance of the Qt# DTD since we already have a binding 
generator using this.  It seems easy to read and pretty feature full if not 
perfect.