[Kde-bindings] Using a custom RealProxy to implement a C# SMOKE adaptor

[Marcus]

I believe that C# has superior mechanisms for interoperating with C and C++ 
than does Java. RealProxy was designed for remoting, and there is going to be 
a substantial amount of overhead in any kind of remoting activity.


On Thursday 21 August 2003 5:03 am, Richard Dale wrote:

> I'm interested in whether creating a facade of custom RealProxy's to allow
> all C# calls to be funneled into a single Invoke() is a good thing. That
> Invoke() needn't even call the SMOKE library - it could be some other
> 'black box' created in a different way. Is dynamic method overloading
> resolution and despatch a problem with respect to efficiency compared with
> the normal static despatch approach in language bindings. Once, you had
> built a RealProxy based facade in C#, it could be easily used for all the
> other .NET languages.