Minimum API level?

[Aleix Pol]

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 10:22 PM Volker Krause <vkrause at kde.org> wrote:

> On Monday, 14 January 2019 21:08:56 CET Volker Krause wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > yet another version question: which is the minimum API level we want to
> > support?
> >
> > During the KF5Notification review going below 23 was suggested (still a
> > relevant market share).
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history suggest anything
> below
> > 16 would be pointless (no market share anymore).
> >
> > https://wiki.qt.io/Android specifies 13 as the lower limit that Qt
> supports
> > for applications.
> >
> > https://developer.android.com/about/dashboards/ would suggest >= 19
> based on
> > market share.
> >
> > I'm asking as I just tried to test KF5Notifications on API level 21 (via
> KDE
> > Itinerary), which failed:
> > - Aleix's APK:
> dlopen("/data/data/org.kde.itinerary/lib/libQt5Network.so",
> > RTLD_LAZY) failed: dlopen failed: cannot locate symbol
> > "ASN1_STRING_get0_data" referenced by "libQt5Network.so"...
> > - my local build: dlopen("/data/data/org.kde.itinerary/lib/
> > libKF5CoreAddons.so", RTLD_LAZY) failed: dlopen failed: cannot locate
> symbol
> > "__register_atfork" referenced by "libKF5CoreAddons.so"...
>
> FTR, that was a local issue, I got API level 21 working with my build,
> without
> requiring code changes even, so it's not as bad as I had initially feared.
>
> That makes [19, 21] the interesting range to decide from I think.
>
> > Both APKs work fine on API level 24.
> >
> > What do you think?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Volker
>
>
Does this mean we need to fix something on the binary-factory builds?

Aleix
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-android/attachments/20190115/edc8bf07/attachment.html>