[Kde-accessibility] KDE and AT-SPI [was: Re: Is it the time for
"KSpeach"?]
Olaf Jan Schmidt
ojschmidt at kde.org
Wed Sep 15 18:46:28 CEST 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
[Bill Haneman, Mittwoch, 15. September 2004 18:04]
> In any case, I think it makes more sense to use the ATK/at-spi
> interfaces which Qt.next will be providing for this purpose, including
> AtkAction.
>
I am not sure this will be technically possible, because the Qt-ATK bridge
is server-side only. We don't have a solution for client side AT-SPI
support in Qt/KDE yet, mainly because the use of ORBit2 in KDE is not an
option due to dependency issues.
Our strategy for KDE Accessibility is to support AT-SPI as soon as
possible on the application side, and then to work with you on the
changes that are needed for KDE/Qt-based AT clients.
D-BUS will be used by both KDE and GNOME, so it would make sense to use it
as a base protocol for AT-SPI. We could reuse most of the AT-SPI
protocol, of course. We might also change a number of things in the
AT-SPI protocol that are needed to make Gnopernicus stable and quicker,
but I am no expert in this area. Thomas Friehoff mentioned a couple of
points in his talk in Ludwigsburg.
Gnopernicus was written in such a way that it could use a different
protocol for AT communication, as Thomas pointed out in Ludwigsburg. I
expect the situation to be similar for Dasher, since it is also running
on Windows. How closely is GOK tied to CORBA? Does it use cspi?
Olaf
- --
Olaf Jan Schmidt, KDE Accessibility Project
KDEAP co-maintainer, maintainer of http://accessibility.kde.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkFIceQACgkQoLYC8AehV8fLugCgsvb6U0rFTVqaRfT3B/WJpFCd
L3IAoIWHyaZ5mvNyB/rNADZmcYIS+EGC
=xRhs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kde-accessibility
mailing list