[Kalzium] Avogadro port so far...
Benoît Jacob
jacob at math.jussieu.fr
Fri May 18 22:41:16 CEST 2007
Just for the record: Carsten and I have more or less agreed on IRC that a
dropdown is better than radiobuttons because it takes less GUI real estate.
Benoit
On Friday 18 May 2007 17:40:11 Carsten Niehaus wrote:
> Am Freitag, 18. Mai 2007 17:36:15 schrieb Benoît Jacob:
> > -- find a nice GUI way to let the user choose the Engines. Here the
> > Avogadro way (with checkboxes) is not suitable for Kalzium so here's what
> > I propose (I still don't know how to use Designer):
> > Have 4 radio-buttons for {sphere,bsdy,wire,stick}engine. These 4 engines
> > should be mutually exclusive (i guess for Kalzium having more than one
> > engine simultaneously is overkill).
> > Then have 1 checkbox for the label-engine (which by the way we need to
> > tweak in avogadro's trunk to allow it to render more useful information).
>
> I agree the radio-button way is good!
>
> Carsten
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kalzium/attachments/20070518/45439346/attachment.pgp
More information about the Kalzium
mailing list